⚠ Flock Safety contract renewed April 28 — the fight moves to accountability.  What you can do →

The contract was renewed.
The fight moves to accountability.

El Paso is not Flock's customer.
El Paso residents are still the product.

On April 28, 2026, the city administratively renewed the Flock Safety contract through an MVCPA grant — $693,334 in grant funds plus $138,666 in city tax dollars. An amendment requires EPPD to write the next grant application without naming Flock exclusively, meaning El Paso can now choose from other approved vendors. None of the underlying problems have been fixed. We are calling on council to hold EPPD accountable to the amendment and demand the accountability conditions El Paso's community deserves.

A renewal doesn't fix what's broken

The April 28 renewal keeps the cameras running — but changes nothing about the underlying security failures, data access problems, or vendor accountability issues the city has never publicly addressed.

$832,000
Total renewal cost — $693,334 MVCPA grant + $138,666 El Paso tax dollars
$7,500,000,000
Flock Safety's valuation — a Georgia startup with $950 million in venture capital

El Paso renewed a contract with a vendor that quietly removed data-sale prohibitions from its Terms of Service two months earlier. A vendor with 22 confirmed federal security vulnerabilities. A vendor whose cameras can be physically hacked in 30 seconds. A vendor whose audit logs go to ICE — not to El Paso PD.

The amendment requiring open vendor selection is meaningful — but only if residents and council hold EPPD to it. That requires pressure, public comment, and continued attention.

What the amendment means

EPPD must write the next MVCPA grant application without naming Flock Safety exclusively. That creates a real path to a different — potentially locally governed — vendor. EPPD told council that if acceptable terms cannot be negotiated with Flock, a different Buy Board vendor will be chosen. That's a lever worth using.

Three ways to make an impact

Start with whichever feels easiest. All three together take less than 15 minutes.

What to say when you call

You'll likely reach a staffer, not the representative directly. That's fine — staffers log every call. Be polite, be clear, and stick to the script.

Phone script — 2 minutes
"Hi, my name is [YOUR NAME] and I'm a resident of El Paso, District [YOUR DISTRICT]. I'm calling about the Flock Safety license plate reader contract, which was renewed on April 28th. I want [REPRESENTATIVE NAME] to know that I am concerned about how that renewal happened — with no second full council vote — and I want to make sure the accountability amendment is enforced. The amendment requires EPPD to write future grant applications without naming Flock exclusively. I want [REPRESENTATIVE NAME] to hold EPPD to that amendment and to demand answers on the issues that were never resolved: the 22 federal security vulnerabilities, the Harris County data access that was never explained, the deleted data-sale prohibition in Flock's February 2026 Terms rewrite, and the ICE audit log access that EPPD cannot independently verify. El Paso is a border city. Our community deserves more than assurances from a vendor valued at $7.5 billion on our data. Can I count on [REPRESENTATIVE NAME] to hold EPPD accountable on these issues and enforce the open vendor selection amendment? Thank you."
Replace [YOUR NAME], [YOUR DISTRICT], and [REPRESENTATIVE NAME] before calling.

What to send

Keep it focused. A clear, personal message is more effective than a long one.

Email — subject line
Flock Safety contract — enforce the vendor selection amendment and demand accountability
Email — body
Dear [REPRESENTATIVE NAME], My name is [YOUR NAME] and I am a resident of El Paso, District [YOUR DISTRICT]. I am writing about the Flock Safety license plate reader contract, which was administratively renewed on April 28, 2026. I have several concerns I want on the record. The renewal included an amendment requiring EPPD to write future MVCPA grant applications without naming Flock Safety exclusively. I am asking you to hold EPPD to that commitment — and to demand answers on the issues that were never resolved before this renewal was signed: Flock Safety's cameras run Android 8.1 — an operating system discontinued in 2021 that will never receive another security update. The federal cybersecurity database lists 22 confirmed vulnerabilities. Cameras can be physically hacked in 30 seconds. Officer login credentials have been found for sale on dark web markets. In February 2026 — two months before this renewal — Flock rewrote its Terms of Service with 147 changes, including deleting the clause stating they would not sell customer data. This renewal was signed under those new terms. El Paso PD's own transparency portal lists a Harris County commissioner's office — not a law enforcement agency — as having access to our camera data, with no public explanation. ICE's own Privacy Impact Assessment (DHS/ICE/PIA-039) requires audit logs to be provided to ICE — not to local police. EPPD cannot independently verify who has searched El Paso's data. El Paso is a border city with a large immigrant community. Verbal assurances from a $7.5 billion vendor are not sufficient. I am asking you to: 1. Enforce the vendor selection amendment — hold EPPD to writing the next grant without naming Flock exclusively. 2. Demand a public accounting of the Harris County data access. 3. Require a written, enforceable prohibition on immigration enforcement access — not a verbal assurance. 4. Cap data retention by city ordinance, not by a vendor dashboard setting. 5. Require an independent security audit, not a vendor self-assessment. El Paso residents deserve accountability for how this contract was handled. I am watching, and I am not alone. Respectfully, [YOUR NAME] [YOUR ADDRESS / NEIGHBORHOOD] [YOUR PHONE — optional]
Replace all [BRACKETED] fields before sending. Find your representative's contact page in the list below.

El Paso City Council — contact list

Don't know your district? Find it here →

Mayor — citywide

Renard Johnson

Voted against letting the contract expire — March 3
District 1

Alejandra Chávez

Voted against letting the contract expire
District 2

Dr. Josh Acevedo

Voted against letting the contract expire
District 3

Deanna Maldonado-Rocha

Voted against letting the contract expire
District 4

Cynthia Boyar Trejo

Voted against letting the contract expire
District 5

Ivan Niño

Voted against letting the contract expire
District 6

Art Fierro

Voted against letting the contract expire
District 7 ★ Ally

Lily Limón

✓ Voted to let the contract expire
District 8 ★ Ally

Chris Canales

✓ Voted to let the contract expire

★ Reps. Limón and Canales voted for cancellation. Contact them to say thank you and ask them to keep pushing. Contact the other six to change their minds.

How to speak at City Council public comment

You have the right to speak. Here's how.

El Paso City Council meets most Tuesday mornings at City Hall, 300 N. Campbell. Any resident can speak during public comment — you do not need to be invited, you do not need to be an expert, and you do not need to give your address.

To sign up: Sign up by 9am the day of the meeting. Call the City Clerk at (915) 212-0049 or visit elpasotexas.gov/city-clerk

You get 3 minutes. Stick to the facts. Be respectful. End with a clear ask: "I am asking this council to vote against renewing the Flock Safety contract."

Need Spanish interpretation? Call (915) 212-0049 by noon the Friday before the meeting to request it at no cost.

Pro tip: Print and bring copies of our facts page to hand to council members and staff. A physical document in someone's hand is harder to ignore than a website.

What to say in 3 minutes

State your name and district. Say you are concerned about how the Flock renewal was handled and you want the accountability amendment enforced. Give one or two specific facts — the Android 8.1 operating system that can never be patched, the Harris County data access question, the deleted data-sale prohibition in the February 2026 Terms rewrite. End with a specific ask: "I am asking this council to hold EPPD to the open vendor selection amendment and require written accountability conditions before the next grant application is submitted." One person speaking clearly and calmly does more than ten people shouting.

Share this site

The most powerful thing you can do after contacting your representative is tell someone else. Share this site. Tell your neighbors. Post it in your neighborhood group. The cameras are still running — and none of the accountability questions were answered before the April 28 renewal.

Share the site

deflockelpaso.org

Send it to anyone who drives in El Paso. That's everyone. Every person who drives past a Flock camera is in this.

Use the line

"El Paso residents are the product."

Post it. Say it. Put it in your neighborhood group. It's true, it's documented, and it's hard to argue with.

Get involved

Contact